You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am currently researching the "nedelec element" for "nurbs versions" for IGA. I carefully read the answer to question #566 and noticed that the Ti matrix only exists in the calculation of shape functions for triangular or tetrahedral elements. Why don't we directly use the simple and easy to calculate basis functions, and why do we need to undergo a transformation。Is it because the basic function of this simple calculation does not meet this condition:f_j(φ_i)=δ_{i,j}?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, we need basis functions on individual elements in the mesh that can be easily stitched together globally. This easy with the "nodal" basis {φ_i} while with the "easy to evaluate" basis {ψ_i} it is not.
I am currently researching the "nedelec element" for "nurbs versions" for IGA. I carefully read the answer to question #566 and noticed that the Ti matrix only exists in the calculation of shape functions for triangular or tetrahedral elements. Why don't we directly use the simple and easy to calculate basis functions, and why do we need to undergo a transformation。Is it because the basic function of this simple calculation does not meet this condition:f_j(φ_i)=δ_{i,j}?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: