Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why not directly use the easily computable basis functions? in the question 566 #4278

Closed
kaipengliuHIT opened this issue May 2, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@kaipengliuHIT
Copy link

kaipengliuHIT commented May 2, 2024

I am currently researching the "nedelec element" for "nurbs versions" for IGA. I carefully read the answer to question #566 and noticed that the Ti matrix only exists in the calculation of shape functions for triangular or tetrahedral elements. Why don't we directly use the simple and easy to calculate basis functions, and why do we need to undergo a transformation。Is it because the basic function of this simple calculation does not meet this condition:f_j(φ_i)=δ_{i,j}?

@v-dobrev
Copy link
Member

v-dobrev commented May 2, 2024

Yes, we need basis functions on individual elements in the mesh that can be easily stitched together globally. This easy with the "nodal" basis {φ_i} while with the "easy to evaluate" basis {ψ_i} it is not.

@tzanio tzanio self-assigned this May 11, 2024
@tzanio tzanio closed this as completed May 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants