Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about potential AMR improvements #4249

Closed
Marinovsky opened this issue Apr 15, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Question about potential AMR improvements #4249

Marinovsky opened this issue Apr 15, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@Marinovsky
Copy link

Hey there! I was reading the MFEM implementation of AMR in https://docs.mfem.org/html/classmfem_1_1ThresholdRefiner.html#a38c1c7e70aa4854dac52e5a076c220e7 and I noticed you were sequentially traversing all the elements in the mesh each time you were going to refine it, so I was wondering if it was possible to refine the mesh in a more efficient way. For instance, I know that Paramesh(https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19990110710/downloads/19990110710.pdf) used some sort of hierarchical approach dividing the mesh into half's (similarly to a binary search). Additionally, I was wondering if there were plans to implement AMR with reinforcement learning in MFEM, as shown in this paper from LLNL scientists (https://proceedings.mlr.press/v206/yang23e/yang23e.pdf).

Best Regards,

@tzanio
Copy link
Member

tzanio commented Apr 16, 2024

ping: @jakubcerveny, @rw-andersonm, @tarikdzanic

@tarikdzanic
Copy link

I don't think there are currently any plans to implement the RL for AMR approach in mainline MFEM.

@tzanio tzanio self-assigned this May 11, 2024
@tzanio tzanio closed this as completed May 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants