Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Definition of {ce} #500

Open
lagleki opened this issue Nov 4, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Definition of {ce} #500

lagleki opened this issue Nov 4, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@lagleki
Copy link
Contributor

lagleki commented Nov 4, 2022

Describe the current content
"ce" is inconsistently defined in the refgram. On page 354,
"A ce B" is defined as the set with elements A and B (or {A, B}).
Logically, and together with the left-grouping rule, this means that "la
frank. ce la .alis. ce la djeimyz." means {{Frank, Alice}, James}, that
is, a set with the two members James and the set of Frank and Alice. Page
355 inconsistenly assigns this sumti to the more useful meaning {Frank,
Alice, James}.

Proposed content

Additional context

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant