COOLEST
support in lenstronomy
#451
Replies: 3 comments
-
great idea! Perhaps it can go into Util.param_util? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks for starting the discussion @ajshajib ! Let me simply add some details about the role of the standard we developed:
Although any code-dependent container (such as lenstronomy's kwargs) cannot (and should not) be stored as it is in the JSON template, there is a specific field Then, on top of @LyneVdV's routines that fill in the JSON template based on lenstronomy's setup, one could add additional metadata that directly packs all kwargs or missing information (I am thinking about numerics settings for instance). What do you think? Let me know if something is unclear. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I added my routines in the PR #465 and its content is also discussed in the issue #452 :) ! I created new files in the Util folder. If you think it should belong somewhere else or be part of other existing files, let me know ! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
It would be convenient to have a feature that packs (and loads) the common dictionaries, lists,
kwargs_data
,kwargs_psf
, etc. created/used during modeling into a file in theCOOLEST
format. @LyneVdV informed me that she already has some code that performs this task. 🙏 We can discuss here to figure out where to add such code withinlenstronomy
(e.g.,Util
?), and what would be the requirements/requests for this feature.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions