Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Other] Running theHarvester on subdomains yield weirdness #1343

Open
joaociocca opened this issue Feb 23, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

[Other] Running theHarvester on subdomains yield weirdness #1343

joaociocca opened this issue Feb 23, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@joaociocca
Copy link

Feature Request or Bug or Other
Other

Describe the feature request or bug or other
This is mostly a doubt that I had no idea who/where to ask about. I ran theHarvester against a previously known to me target_subdomain.domain.tld, and the results were a bit... unexpected. Among its 700+ results, most of them were other subdomains I knew about - but instead of being shown back as subdomain.domain.tld, they showed up as subdomain.target_subdomain.domain.tld - and none of these exists, since the target_subdomain does NOT have any subdomains/aliases/whatever attached to it.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behaviour:

  1. Run tool like this: 'theHarvester -d <target_subdomain.domain.tld>' against a known subdomain, from a domain you know have other subdomains.
  2. See error

Expected behaviour
In this case, where target_subdomain.domain.tld is known for not having any subdomains itself, I expected to see only the target_subdomain listed. If I was scanning the domain.tld I'd expect to see all those subdomains tied to it, no to the target_subdomain...

System Information (System that tool is running on):

  • OS: Kali 2022.3
  • Version 4.2.0
@NotoriousRebel
Copy link
Collaborator

A bit late but thanks for raising this issue, this will require some debugging but perhaps might be due to lax regex results that are not strict enough on false positive subdomains. I assume this was run with -b all?

@joaociocca
Copy link
Author

not exactly, but I was using a lot of different sources (part of the script lists the api keys from the repository and allows on manual or actiavates them on auto)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants