Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Request] An import/export port mapping presets feature #26

Open
jacobmix opened this issue Jun 9, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

[Request] An import/export port mapping presets feature #26

jacobmix opened this issue Jun 9, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@jacobmix
Copy link

jacobmix commented Jun 9, 2017

I'd like to share some port mapping presets with friends so they can easily use them,
and not slowly have to add them themselves. (Annoying for bigger ones)
Think such a feature would be nice to have. Could such a feature be possible to implement?

@jacobmix jacobmix changed the title [Request] An import feature would be nice. [Request] An import/export port mapping presets feature would be nice. Jun 9, 2017
@jacobmix jacobmix changed the title [Request] An import/export port mapping presets feature would be nice. [Request] An import/export port mapping presets feature Jun 9, 2017
@kaklakariada
Copy link
Owner

Hi @jacobmix , PortMapper stores the port mappings in ~/.PortMapper/settings.xml. Copy this file and replace it. Make sure that PortMapper is not running when replacing the file.

@jacobmix
Copy link
Author

This overrides all the settings if just replacing the file, and isn't user friendly to manually add one rule or such inside the file itself by editing. Getting a file from a friend or shared online, and just being able to import it easily inside PortMapper would be preferred. I'd still like to see this feature really implemented.

@tylerr147
Copy link

I mean you are literally copying the file, and then putting it in the same dir in a different installation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants