-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Actix scripting environment #23
Comments
Ullage has grown into a more statically compiles language rather than a scripting one. Torchbear does look impressive. Not sure how you would integrate ullage like that though. |
could it support scripting? perhaps similar to rustscript |
It would be interesting to investigate. Maybe a switch back to JIT compilation using cranelift and more of an embedable scripting language. C# scripting and Roslyn comes to mind as a good example of how you can make a statically compiled language scriptable. |
I think changes to modular code and small-medium sized code bases should compile fast enough to make JIT related research unnecessary I guess one difference then between Actix-Lua and Actix-Ullage, in that regard, would be handling a runtime re/compilation step |
yea, I mean like this https://github.com/faern/rustscript#internals |
based on Actix-Lua
further downstream: jazzdotdev/jazz#234
what do you think, @iwillspeak?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: