Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Should we have a microbenchmark for FP conversion operations #1123

Open
FMarno opened this issue May 14, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #1202
Open

Should we have a microbenchmark for FP conversion operations #1123

FMarno opened this issue May 14, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #1202
Assignees
@FMarno
Labels
enhancement New feature or request performance question Further information is requested
Milestone
4.3 [Performance]...

Comments

@FMarno
Copy link
Contributor

FMarno commented May 14, 2024 •
edited

I was interested in created in a micro-benchmark for FP conversions to 16 bit representations, based on #1076, but the draft I've created doesn't really fit with the other micro-benchmarks since it's not comparing to triton. Is this an acceptable use of micro-benchmark or is this something different?
draft: #1202
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@FMarno FMarno

Labels
enhancement New feature or request performance question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Milestone
4.3 [Performance] Tracking
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Setup microbenchmark structure + bfloat conversion bench intel/intel-xpu-backend-for-triton
2 participants
@FMarno @vlad-penkin