New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Mention fallback in SC #2528

Open

mnot opened this issue Apr 28, 2023 · 0 comments

Labels

Member

mnot commented Apr 28, 2023

As Martin points out in #2520, compatible fields don't inherit the security benefits of structured fields if parsers fall back to non-SF parsers.

mnot added the retrofit label

mnot mentioned this issue

Mnot/2499 #2520

Merged

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment