You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the different Tiler support the check_tissue as a boolean parameter. An additional configuration like tissue_percent is given as another parameter. This makes extensions as in the case of issue #354 complicated.
I propose to accept a callable in check_tissue instead. We could then design an (abstract) class TileChecker with a subclass MinTissuePercent or something similar. We then gain additional flexibility and support other workflows.
I would be happy to contribute a pull request. However, is such a breaking change acceptable?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, the different
Tiler
support thecheck_tissue
as a boolean parameter. An additional configuration liketissue_percent
is given as another parameter. This makes extensions as in the case of issue #354 complicated.I propose to accept a callable in
check_tissue
instead. We could then design an (abstract) classTileChecker
with a subclassMinTissuePercent
or something similar. We then gain additional flexibility and support other workflows.I would be happy to contribute a pull request. However, is such a breaking change acceptable?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: