New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MediaPipe Pose on two synchronized videos #5376
Comments
Hi @mcdonasd1212, After reviewing the provided standalone code, it appears that you are currently using the outdated pose solution, which is no longer maintained, and we have ceased support for it. This functionality has been integrated into the new Pose Landmarker Task API, detailed here. We encourage you to explore the features of our updated Pose Landmarker Task API and suggest replacing the legacy Pose with the new Pose Landmarker. The new solution offers improved performance and additional functionality compared to the legacy pose solution. You can find the guide for the new Pose Landmarker here, along with specific instructions for implementation in the Python platform provided here. Additionally, a corresponding example Colab notebook is available for reference here. Please report any observed behavior, ensuring to check if similar issues persist in the upgraded task API. We value your feedback. Unfortunately, beyond this, there is limited action we can take to address the specific issue you are facing. Thank you!! |
Sorry for the confusion, I am asking why the legacy pose solution works, the NEW POSE LANDMARKER DOES NOT.
Any advice?
…________________________________
From: kuaashish ***@***.***>
Sent: Monday, May 6, 2024 5:53:07 AM
To: google/mediapipe ***@***.***>
Cc: mcdonasd1212 ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [google/mediapipe] MediaPipe Pose on two synchronized videos (Issue #5376)
Hi @mcdonasd1212<https://github.com/mcdonasd1212>,
After reviewing the provided standalone code, it appears that you are currently using the outdated pose solution, which is no longer maintained, and we have ceased support for it. This functionality has been integrated into the new Pose Landmarker Task API, detailed here<https://developers.google.com/mediapipe/solutions/guide#legacy>.
We encourage you to explore the features of our updated Pose Landmarker Task API and suggest replacing the legacy Pose with the new Pose Landmarker. The new solution offers improved performance and additional functionality compared to the legacy pose solution. You can find the guide for the new Pose Landmarker here<https://developers.google.com/mediapipe/solutions/vision/pose_landmarker>, along with specific instructions for implementation in the Python platform provided here<https://developers.google.com/mediapipe/solutions/vision/pose_landmarker/python>. Additionally, a corresponding example Colab notebook is available for reference here<https://colab.sandbox.google.com/github/googlesamples/mediapipe/blob/main/examples/pose_landmarker/python/%5BMediaPipe_Python_Tasks%5D_Pose_Landmarker.ipynb>.
Please report any observed behavior, ensuring to check if similar issues persist in the upgraded task API. We value your feedback. Unfortunately, beyond this, there is limited action we can take to address the specific issue you are facing.
Thank you!!
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#5376 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AUU6XBZWYIAU3GQPPX3A7PLZA5HIHAVCNFSM6AAAAABHHF4HFCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDAOJVGU4TMNBXGE>.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Hi @mcdonasd1212, Please verify with the latest version 0.10.13, which we recently released. If the issue persists, could you kindly provide the standalone code or steps you are following from our documentation, along with the version of Python being used, to reproduce the issue? This will help us identify and address any genuine bugs. Thank you!! |
This issue has been marked stale because it has no recent activity since 7 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you. |
This issue was closed due to lack of activity after being marked stale for past 7 days. |
Have I written custom code (as opposed to using a stock example script provided in MediaPipe)
Yes
OS Platform and Distribution
Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS
MediaPipe Tasks SDK version
0.10.11
Task name (e.g. Image classification, Gesture recognition etc.)
Pose
Programming Language and version (e.g. C++, Python, Java)
Python
Describe the actual behavior
When implementing 10.11 the code example is very slow. However with the legacy code, the example performance is acceptable.
Describe the expected behaviour
MediaPipe 10.11 to have similar performance as legacy for the example.
Standalone code/steps you may have used to try to get what you need
Here is an example the example code with acceptable performance. How can I implement 10.11?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: