-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 187
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rectilinear transitions not moved consistently when moving parent state machine #3071
Comments
Hi @ebousse, thanks I can reproduce this. |
Hi! When I was working with Gaphor for prototyping the structure of a university project I noticed this bug too, so I was wondering if this was a good-first-issue to start. I've already reproduced the bug in my machine and want to give this issue a go. Looking at the culture of the project and past issues, I didn't see many "assigns", so I was wondering if you could assign this issue to me ? |
Hey @FranciscoTGouveia, glad to have your contributions! |
Hi @danyeaw, I spent the past month trying to fix this bug, but it's a lot deeper than what I thought. Firstly, I noticed that this issue isn’t exclusive to State Machines but it also encompasses other diagrams such as UML. Moreover, the initial bug report describes a bug where rectilinear transitions are not moved consistently, but what I found out is that, if a transition is not rectilinear, the new handle created in the I’ve tried to follow the trace of the When I look more carefully at the With that said, I don’t know what the consequences of tinkering with these constraints in |
Describe the bug
With a diagram containing a state machine element that includes states and rectilinear transitions, when moving the state machine element around, rectilinear transitions are not moved consistently − some of their lines don't move while everything else moves.
To Reproduce
Expected behavior
Part of the transition is not moved correctly.
Screenshots
Video:
Capture.video.du.2024-02-02.14-19-10.webm
OS
Version
Version of Gaphor: 2.23.2
Additional information
I have the vague impression that I may have already submitted this bug in the past, but I can't seem to find it, so maybe my memory is playing me tricks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: