You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Smart helmet sensor localisation resulted in multiple sensors occupying same slot in a few cases when sensors were far inside their slots. In all cases they ended up in a neighbouring slot much deeper than reasonable.
Example of a correct and incorrect localisation was shared with Robert who asked to raise this issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Ah, this could also explain the fact that in one the Nijmegen recordings (I need to look this up) I remember seeing one sensor blabla-bz-1, which might be the consequence of one of the sensors being allocated erroneously (and thus a double occurrence)
@schoffelen That is exactly how we noticed the problem. The "-1" is added because the name already exists. If you plot the locations in 3d you can clearly see that they occupy the same slot but at different depths.
I met with Fieldline yesterday and they have modified the localisation procedure to fix the localisation errors. Still need to confirm the results, though.
Smart helmet sensor localisation resulted in multiple sensors occupying same slot in a few cases when sensors were far inside their slots. In all cases they ended up in a neighbouring slot much deeper than reasonable.
Example of a correct and incorrect localisation was shared with Robert who asked to raise this issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: