Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

deal with FieldLine smart helmet sensor localization errors #2369

Open
chrisNatMEG opened this issue Jan 17, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

deal with FieldLine smart helmet sensor localization errors #2369

chrisNatMEG opened this issue Jan 17, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@chrisNatMEG
Copy link

Smart helmet sensor localisation resulted in multiple sensors occupying same slot in a few cases when sensors were far inside their slots. In all cases they ended up in a neighbouring slot much deeper than reasonable.

Example of a correct and incorrect localisation was shared with Robert who asked to raise this issue.

@robertoostenveld
Copy link
Contributor

for reference, I have copied the data to /home/common/matlab/fieldtrip/data/test/issue2369

@robertoostenveld robertoostenveld changed the title HEDscan smart helmet sensor localisation error deal with FieldLine smart helmet sensor localization errors Jan 19, 2024
@schoffelen
Copy link
Contributor

Ah, this could also explain the fact that in one the Nijmegen recordings (I need to look this up) I remember seeing one sensor blabla-bz-1, which might be the consequence of one of the sensors being allocated erroneously (and thus a double occurrence)

@chrisNatMEG
Copy link
Author

@schoffelen That is exactly how we noticed the problem. The "-1" is added because the name already exists. If you plot the locations in 3d you can clearly see that they occupy the same slot but at different depths.

I met with Fieldline yesterday and they have modified the localisation procedure to fix the localisation errors. Still need to confirm the results, though.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants