You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Then, I think it's better to have Windows releases in zip format, since there is no .tar.gz support natively, I use 7zip for that.
It would be very, very cool if you could provide Windows binary releases as .zip archive instead of .tar.gz – Windows isn't natively able to unpack/work with .tar.gz. This makes it especially troublesome because tools such as winget are also not able to deal with .tar.gz either.
Providing .zip files would open up a lot of additional fancy integration possibilities via e.g. winget and related tooling making adoption on Windows way easier and nicer.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@mstruebing I may be able to provide a PR for this but just to be sure I am not overlooking anything too obvious … the relevant change would be in the Makefile and probably involve a Windows vs. everything else check, right?
@Okeanos yes you are right. Except you would want to compress all binaries as zips.
The wrapper (php, javascript, pyhton) will need to adjust anyway so I would think one format which can be used anywhere would be better than making exceptions - if that's possible. But I guess zip is common on every OS.
As very briefly mentioned in #204
It would be very, very cool if you could provide Windows binary releases as
.zip
archive instead of.tar.gz
– Windows isn't natively able to unpack/work with.tar.gz
. This makes it especially troublesome because tools such aswinget
are also not able to deal with.tar.gz
either.Providing
.zip
files would open up a lot of additional fancy integration possibilities via e.g.winget
and related tooling making adoption on Windows way easier and nicer.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: