Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

get_variance_distribution() returns NULL for brms negative binomial model #776

Open
MCMaurer opened this issue May 29, 2023 · 0 comments
Open
Labels
3 investigators ❔❓ Need to look further into this issue get_variance function specific labels

Comments

@MCMaurer
Copy link

MCMaurer commented May 29, 2023

library(brms)
library(insight)

set.seed(12901)
d <- data.frame(resp = rnbinom(100, 23, 0.4))

m1 <- brm(
  resp ~ 1,
  data = d,
  family = negbinomial(),
  iter = 10000, warmup = 3000,
  chains = 4, cores = 4,
  init = "random", seed = 1029
)

# returns NULL
get_variance(m1)

# returns NULL
get_variance_distribution(m1)

sessionInfo() results:

R version 4.2.1 (2022-06-23)
Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin17.0 (64-bit)
Running under: macOS Monterey 12.6.3

Matrix products: default
LAPACK: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/4.2/Resources/lib/libRlapack.dylib

locale:
[1] en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/C/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8

attached base packages:
[1] stats     graphics  grDevices utils     datasets  methods   base     

other attached packages:
[1] insight_0.14.1 brms_2.17.0    Rcpp_1.0.9    

loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
  [1] nlme_3.1-152         matrixStats_0.62.0   xts_0.12.1           threejs_0.3.3        rstan_2.26.11       
  [6] tensorA_0.36.2       tools_4.2.1          backports_1.4.1      utf8_1.2.2           R6_2.5.1            
 [11] DT_0.22              mgcv_1.8-36          projpred_2.0.2       DBI_1.1.1            colorspace_2.0-3    
 [16] tidyselect_1.1.2     gridExtra_2.3        prettyunits_1.1.1    processx_3.5.3       Brobdingnag_1.2-7   
 [21] emmeans_1.6.1        curl_4.3.2           compiler_4.2.1       cli_3.3.0            shinyjs_2.1.0       
 [26] sandwich_3.0-1       colourpicker_1.1.1   posterior_1.2.1      scales_1.2.1         dygraphs_1.1.1.6    
 [31] checkmate_2.1.0      mvtnorm_1.1-3        ggridges_0.5.3       callr_3.7.0          stringr_1.4.0       
 [36] digest_0.6.29        StanHeaders_2.26.11  minqa_1.2.4          base64enc_0.1-3      pkgconfig_2.0.3     
 [41] htmltools_0.5.2      lme4_1.1-29          fastmap_1.1.0        htmlwidgets_1.5.4    rlang_1.0.4         
 [46] rstudioapi_0.13      shiny_1.7.1          farver_2.1.1         generics_0.1.3       zoo_1.8-10          
 [51] jsonlite_1.8.0       crosstalk_1.2.0      gtools_3.9.2         dplyr_1.0.9          distributional_0.3.0
 [56] inline_0.3.19        magrittr_2.0.3       loo_2.5.1            bayesplot_1.9.0      Matrix_1.3-4        
 [61] munsell_0.5.0        fansi_1.0.3          abind_1.4-5          lifecycle_1.0.1      stringi_1.7.8       
 [66] multcomp_1.4-17      MASS_7.3-54          pkgbuild_1.3.1       plyr_1.8.7           grid_4.2.1          
 [71] parallel_4.2.1       promises_1.2.0.1     crayon_1.5.1         miniUI_0.1.1.1       lattice_0.20-44     
 [76] splines_4.2.1        ps_1.7.0             pillar_1.8.1         igraph_1.3.1         boot_1.3-28         
 [81] markdown_1.1         estimability_1.3     shinystan_2.6.0      reshape2_1.4.4       codetools_0.2-18    
 [86] stats4_4.2.1         rstantools_2.2.0     glue_1.6.2           V8_4.1.0             RcppParallel_5.1.5  
 [91] nloptr_2.0.2         vctrs_0.4.1          httpuv_1.6.5         gtable_0.3.0         purrr_0.3.4         
 [96] assertthat_0.2.1     ggplot2_3.3.6        mime_0.12            xtable_1.8-4         coda_0.19-4         
[101] later_1.3.0          survival_3.2-11      tibble_3.1.8         shinythemes_1.2.0    gamm4_0.2-6         
[106] TH.data_1.0-10       ellipsis_0.3.2       bridgesampling_1.1-2
@strengejacke strengejacke added 3 investigators ❔❓ Need to look further into this issue get_variance function specific labels labels Sep 1, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3 investigators ❔❓ Need to look further into this issue get_variance function specific labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants