Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"Close inactive issues" action, a.k.a. stale.yml needs an update to v9 #5127

Closed
2 tasks done
ts678 opened this issue Mar 12, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #5198
Closed
2 tasks done

"Close inactive issues" action, a.k.a. stale.yml needs an update to v9 #5127

ts678 opened this issue Mar 12, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #5198

Comments

@ts678
Copy link
Collaborator

ts678 commented Mar 12, 2024

  • I have searched open and closed issues for duplicates.
  • I have searched the forum for related topics.

Description

Issues are not properly undergoing stale processing, plus there are other problems with v8 that v9 will presumably resolve.
Purging old Github issues is the idea behind this. Labeling of most issues is basically done now, but the action is far behind.

Steps to reproduce

  1. Query is:issue is:open sort:updated-asc label:"pending user feedback") -label:stale (and any other disqualifiers, if you like)
  2. Look in Actions at "Close inactive issues" run, and see the complaints about Node.js16 going away, operations limits, etc.
  • Actual result:
    Stale processing gets far behind, with lots of complaints in its report.
  • Expected result:
    Stale processing occurs in a more timely manner without complaints.

EDIT:

v9.0.0 sounds like its stateful nature will eventually cycle through all issues. I'm less confident about v8, as some of them are a month past due on going stale. v9 also fixes the Node.js end of life problem by moving before the planned Spring 2024 cutoff.

Screenshots

Debug log

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant