Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Elided inline code blocks feed nlprules bad input and hence reporst an increased number of false positives #242

Open
drahnr opened this issue Dec 8, 2021 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working checker / nlprules nplrules related checker topics

Comments

@drahnr
Copy link
Owner

drahnr commented Dec 8, 2021

Describe the bug

To Reproduce

Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. A file containing
    /// A is caused by creating an instance of `Foo` on basis `Bar`.
  2. Run cargo spellcheck ...
  3. Get weird suggestion of on to become online.

Expected behavior

Be ok.

@drahnr drahnr added bug Something isn't working checker / nlprules nplrules related checker topics labels Dec 8, 2021
@drahnr drahnr self-assigned this Dec 8, 2021
drahnr added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 8, 2021
The first experience counts, so disabling nlprules until
issue #242 is resolved, seems reasonable.
This was referenced Dec 8, 2021
@drahnr drahnr changed the title Elided inline code blocks feeds nlprules bad input and hence reporst an increased number of false positives Elided inline code blocks feed nlprules bad input and hence reporst an increased number of false positives Dec 9, 2021
drahnr added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 10, 2021
The first experience counts, so disabling nlprules until
issue #242 is resolved, seems reasonable.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working checker / nlprules nplrules related checker topics
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant