Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Failing analysis of macro test prevents other actions #3656

Open
eernstg opened this issue Mar 15, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #3660
Open

Failing analysis of macro test prevents other actions #3656

eernstg opened this issue Mar 15, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #3660
Labels
bug There is a mistake in the language specification or in an active document static-metaprogramming Issues related to static metaprogramming

Comments

@eernstg
Copy link
Member

eernstg commented Mar 15, 2024

The Dart CI log at https://github.com/dart-lang/language/actions/runs/8084567444/job/22725574044 shows a failure during the analyzer task dart analyze --fatal-infos ., in working/macros/example/benchmark/src/shared.dart:91:71 and elsewhere.

This causes other tasks to remain undone (in this case: no new PDF is created for the language specification when it is updated).

@jakemac53, would it be possible to fix the example, or somehow adjust the processing such that it doesn't block other tasks?

@eernstg eernstg added bug There is a mistake in the language specification or in an active document static-metaprogramming Issues related to static metaprogramming labels Mar 15, 2024
@jakemac53
Copy link
Contributor

@jakemac53, would it be possible to fix the example, or somehow adjust the processing such that it doesn't block other tasks?

Yes we can allow it to fail, I can do that

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug There is a mistake in the language specification or in an active document static-metaprogramming Issues related to static metaprogramming
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants