Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Easy way to install firmware #1922

Closed
andreasn opened this issue Mar 16, 2015 · 8 comments
Closed

Easy way to install firmware #1922

andreasn opened this issue Mar 16, 2015 · 8 comments

Comments

@andreasn
Copy link
Contributor

Way down on the priority list probably, but filing here so I don't forget.
https://github.com/hughsie/fwupd/blob/master/README.md

@stefwalter
Copy link
Contributor

By default, any users are able to install firmware to removable hardware. The logic here is that if the hardware can be removed, it can easily be moved to a device that the user already has root access on, and asking for authentication would just be security theatre.

@hughsie This doesn't work for servers, where physical access is restricted. But I imagine this isn't hard to change.

@stefwalter
Copy link
Contributor

fwupd has the same dependency issues as PackageKit itself, bringing in all of GTK+, X dependencies etc.

@hughsie
Copy link
Contributor

hughsie commented Mar 16, 2015

Well, the GTK dep will be brought in from appstream-glib, which we've still not found a solution for. I assume the real issue here is the gtk3 dep, rather than the gdk-pixbuf dep, right?

@stefwalter
Copy link
Contributor

@hughsie gdk-pixbuf depends on libX11 ... so yes it is problematic as well.

In addition having libjpeg, libtiff, libjasper, libpng on servers is a bit odd. But not as problematic as X and GTK

@hughsie
Copy link
Contributor

hughsie commented Mar 20, 2015

I've been sorting this out in rawhide. In f23 the only dep we pull by default is libpng which I think is a lot more palatable than what we have now.

@stefwalter
Copy link
Contributor

I'll be moving this to the ideas page. @andreasn Are you okay with that? Or do you have a plan to work on this?

@stefwalter
Copy link
Contributor

@andreasn
Copy link
Contributor Author

Are you okay with that? Or do you have a plan to work on this?

No, not anytime soon. I think the roadmap has enough things on it as it is. I think it's fine on the Ideas page for now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants