Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

iso19139 aggregate-dataset-* implementation is missing #264

Open
ccancellieri opened this issue Oct 28, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

iso19139 aggregate-dataset-* implementation is missing #264

ccancellieri opened this issue Oct 28, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@ccancellieri
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,
I'm seeing that that we are correctly extracting the following informations from the iso19139:
# 'aggregate-dataset-identifier'
# 'aggregate-dataset-name'
# 'aggregate-dataset-type'

But then the base implementation of the get_package is not providing a corresponding map as package.

I was going to implement these as resources but I think it would be formally better IF we can start using relations between packages.

The fields above are used normally to link existing metadata to the metada shipping these informations, so we may use aggregate-dataset-identifier to reference other metadata by GUID

Thoughts?

@ccancellieri
Copy link
Contributor Author

ccancellieri commented Oct 28, 2021

Here is an example of a metadata aggregated to another by UUID, this implies that both metadata are on the same catalog.

<gmd:aggregationInfo>
<gmd:MD_AggregateInformation>
<gmd:aggregateDataSetIdentifier>
<gmd:MD_Identifier>
<gmd:code>
<gco:CharacterString>194------------------8029-4583--------------------086</gco:CharacterString>
</gmd:code>
</gmd:MD_Identifier>
</gmd:aggregateDataSetIdentifier>
<gmd:associationType>
<gmd:DS_AssociationTypeCode codeList="http://standards.iso.org/iso/19139/resources/gmxCodelists.xml#DS_AssociationTypeCode" codeListValue="crossReference"/>
</gmd:associationType>
</gmd:MD_AggregateInformation>
</gmd:aggregationInfo>

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant