Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Random result of ifp? #194

Open
tom832 opened this issue Mar 15, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Random result of ifp? #194

tom832 opened this issue Mar 15, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@tom832
Copy link

tom832 commented Mar 15, 2024

When I use prolif to analyze the ifp of following receptor and ligand, it gave me different ifp results.
So is there any random module or algorithm in proliferation?
BTW, I use plf.Fingerprint(count=True) in my code.

receptor file: 7en8_clean_H.pdbfixer.pdb.txt

ligand file:7en8_lig_H.sdf.txt

@cbouy
Copy link
Member

cbouy commented Mar 15, 2024

Well at least not intentionally. I gave your files a go and the results for 10 repeats are the exact same, are you sure you tried on the same python installation? Which version are you using?

@tom832
Copy link
Author

tom832 commented Apr 9, 2024

I found it might be the random positions of added H with pdbfixer I used.
Have you ever found this issue? or how can I get solid added Hs‘ positions?

@cbouy
Copy link
Member

cbouy commented Apr 9, 2024

Ah right, then yes different H positions are going to affect the HBond detection.
Can't offer support for pdbfixer though, but hopefully there's a random seed that you can set there to help with that

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants