Whitespace in queues configuration can cause issues.

[TAGraves]

We had the following queues config for a worker:

"queues": "+workload_5s: 3; +workload_15s,workload_5s:3; +workload_1m,workload_15s,workload_5s:2; +workload_2m,workload_1m,workload_15s,workload_5s:2; +workload_5m,workload_2m,workload_1m,workload_15s,workload_5s:2",

We observed that with this configuration, workload_5m jobs were never being worked. I removed all the spaces from the above configuration:

"queues": "+workload_5s:3;+workload_15s,workload_5s:3;+workload_1m,workload_15s,workload_5s:2;+workload_2m,workload_1m,workload_15s,workload_5s:2;+workload_5m,workload_2m,workload_1m,workload_15s,workload_5s:2",

Then the workload_5m jobs started getting picked up. So it seems like the space between the ; and the +workload_5m, was causing an issue. I don't see it documented anywhere that whitespace is relevant, and indeed the readme even has several examples of whitespace being used in the queue configuration, so I suspect this is a bug.

[bensheldon]

GoodJob should be whitespace tolerant. I'm probably missing some strip's 🤔 Here's where the string gets broken down into a configuration hash:

• Where the configuration constant is broken down:

  good_job/lib/good_job/multi_scheduler.rb

  Lines 12 to 15 in 2586313

  	queue_string, max_threads = queue_string_and_max_threads.split(':')
  	max_threads = (max_threads || configuration.max_threads).to_i
  	job_performer = GoodJob::JobPerformer.new(queue_string)

• Where the comma-separated list of queues gets broken down:

  good_job/app/models/good_job/execution.rb

  Lines 42 to 68 in 2586313

  	def self.queue_parser(string)
  	string = string.presence || '*'
  	case string.first
  	when '-'
  	exclude_queues = true
  	string = string[1..]
  	when '+'
  	ordered_queues = true
  	string = string[1..]
  	end
  	queues = string.split(',').map(&:strip)
  	if queues.include?('*')
  	{ all: true }
  	elsif exclude_queues
  	{ exclude: queues }
  	elsif ordered_queues
  	{
  	include: queues,
  	ordered_queues: true,
  	}
  	else
  	{ include: queues }
  	end
  	end

Also, I love how you've set up your queues 😍

Let me make a test case, but I think it needs more striping

[bensheldon]

Also, I love how you've set up your queues 😍

Unrelated: my one piece of feedback would be not to use the +-queue ordering. That has performance downsides and you likely want to clear faster-SLO jobs first rather than the slower-SLO ones.