You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think the case where this API would be most useful are the dependent_packages_count and dependent_repos_count fields. At the moment, we have libraries.io badges for these but given the problems we are having in #9839 I think implementing some badges that show this data from ecosyste.ms would give users somewhere to go if we aren't able to get an upstream solution to help us get the token pool working again and have to deprecate.
There could be other useful data points that are available from this API, although a lot of them would just replicate data available from the upstream registries themselves (e.g: latest version, downloads, etc). I wouldn't want to get too bogged down in reproducing data points we already get straight from the registries, especially given there is a rate limit to stay under.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
馃搵 Description
https://ecosyste.ms/ collates and publishes open data about a variety of package ecosystems.
I suggest using their API to create 2 badges showing
馃敆 Data
Docs: https://packages.ecosyste.ms/docs/index.html
Some example API calls:
Rate limit: https://github.com/ecosyste-ms/packages/#api
5000/req per hour (pretty generous) with option to contact and request an increase
馃帳 Motivation
I think the case where this API would be most useful are the
dependent_packages_count
anddependent_repos_count
fields. At the moment, we have libraries.io badges for these but given the problems we are having in #9839 I think implementing some badges that show this data from ecosyste.ms would give users somewhere to go if we aren't able to get an upstream solution to help us get the token pool working again and have to deprecate.There could be other useful data points that are available from this API, although a lot of them would just replicate data available from the upstream registries themselves (e.g: latest version, downloads, etc). I wouldn't want to get too bogged down in reproducing data points we already get straight from the registries, especially given there is a rate limit to stay under.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: