Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SPARQL only notebook #213

Open
brianok-aws opened this issue Oct 22, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

SPARQL only notebook #213

brianok-aws opened this issue Oct 22, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects

Comments

@brianok-aws
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
As a user who is only writing SPARQL queries, it is frustrating to have to create a new python3 notebook and use the %%sparql magic in every cell.

Describe the solution you'd like
I would like the option to create a New -> SPARQL notebook and have that notebook implicitly know every cell is a SPARQL query without me specifying the magic.

Describe alternatives you've considered
I am not sure of any alternatives other than typing %%sparql in every cell. It may be enough if the notebook automatically populates the last used cell magic at the top of every new cell.

Additional context

@michaelnchin michaelnchin added this to New issues/Needs triage or review in Planning via automation Oct 22, 2021
@michaelnchin michaelnchin added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 22, 2021
@joywa joywa moved this from New issues/Needs triage or review to Low priority in Planning Jan 18, 2023
@joywa joywa moved this from Low priority to High priority in Planning Jan 18, 2023
@joywa joywa moved this from High priority to Medium priority in Planning Jan 18, 2023
@joywa
Copy link
Contributor

joywa commented Jan 19, 2023

Consider a setting that allows you to keep the same context for %% gremlin, %%oc, or %%sparql

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Planning
Medium priority
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants