We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rye lint
If we look at rye fmt, its behaviour is consistent with running rye run ruff format .:
rye fmt
rye run ruff format .
$ rye fmt 2 files left unchanged $ rye run ruff format . 2 files left unchanged
But if I run rye lint, it doesn't print 'All checks passed!' when rye run ruff check . does.
rye run ruff check .
$ rye lint $ rye run ruff check . All checks passed!
It can be confusing to the end-user who might expect rye lint to print 'All checks passed!'. You wonder if it actually ran properly?
Can rye lint be made consistent with rye run ruff check .?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
That's because this is how ruff behaves today. I did not want to make too many changes here.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
If we look at
rye fmt
, its behaviour is consistent with runningrye run ruff format .
:But if I run
rye lint
, it doesn't print 'All checks passed!' whenrye run ruff check .
does.It can be confusing to the end-user who might expect
rye lint
to print 'All checks passed!'. You wonder if it actually ran properly?Can
rye lint
be made consistent withrye run ruff check .
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: