Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inconsistent length of the orcid arrays and author list #56

Open
cortesec opened this issue Jan 21, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Inconsistent length of the orcid arrays and author list #56

cortesec opened this issue Jan 21, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@cortesec
Copy link

We found several examples of records where the length of the authors list and that of the ORCID arrays (_pub, _user, _other) is different.

In some cases also the size of the orcid arrays is inconsistent, with a _pub array longer than the others.

We are still investigating the issue and we should be able to provide a long list of bibcode to verify, in the coming days.

A first example is 2014ASPC..486..203M

Best regards

Claudio

@csgrant00
Copy link

csgrant00 commented Jan 23, 2020 via email

@svank
Copy link

svank commented Apr 23, 2020

Hi,

I'm coming across some publications with similar issues.

2012P&SS...66...43M has "The Osiris Team" listed as an author, and it looks like ADS is appending (what I assume to be) the membership of the Osiris Team to the author list. The orcid_user field has entries for the nine "real" authors (i.e. excluding "The Osiris Team" and its membership), while orcid_pub has entries for every author in the author field (including "The Osiris Team" and its membership).

2012P&SS...66...64B is another, similar Osiris paper, but both orcid_pub and orcid_user have entries for every entry in the author list, while orcid_other only has entries for the "real" authors.

1981SSRv...30..623V has a single author listed, but has two entries (both '-') for orcid_pub.

Also, for 2012P&SS...66...43M, the API doesn't include "orcid_other" in the response when I request it, and for 1981SSRv...30..623V neither "orcid_other" nor "orcid_user" are included when requested. I'm assuming these fields are excluded from the response when every entry in the list is "-". Is that correct? On the other hand, 2012P&SS...66...64B does return orcid_pub even though every entry is "-".

Thanks,
Sam

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants