-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 58
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Inconsistent length of the orcid arrays and author list #56
Comments
Hi Claudio,
Looks like a bug! It occurs when a record has editors in addition to
authors (so the whole conference series that 2014ASPC..486..203M is a part
of is affected). As far as I can tell, it should only be orcid_pub and not
orcid_other/orcid_user that's affected, as the _pub field is created
separately from the _other/_user fields. But let me know if you see
examples where the _other/_user fields are also a different length than the
author field, as that points to a different sort of problem. Thanks for
pointing this issue out! We'll get it fixed shortly.
Best,
Kelly
…On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 4:35 AM cortesec ***@***.***> wrote:
We found several examples of records where the length of the authors list
and that of the ORCID arrays (_pub, _user, _other) is different.
In some cases also the size of the orcid arrays is inconsistent, with a
_pub array longer than the others.
We are still investigating the issue and we should be able to provide a
long list of bibcode to verify, in the coming days.
A first example is 2014ASPC..486..203M
Best regards
Claudio
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#56?email_source=notifications&email_token=ABKDRFKJT6H3PCTMC6WJCDDQ626XBA5CNFSM4KJQGWRKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFUVEXG43VMWVGG33NNVSW45C7NFSM4IHSFPWA>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABKDRFMSJRPKNG2E46M4J7LQ626XBANCNFSM4KJQGWRA>
.
--
Dr. Kelly Lockhart
Back-End Developer, NASA Astrophysics Data System
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138
|
Hi, I'm coming across some publications with similar issues. 2012P&SS...66...43M has "The Osiris Team" listed as an author, and it looks like ADS is appending (what I assume to be) the membership of the Osiris Team to the author list. The orcid_user field has entries for the nine "real" authors (i.e. excluding "The Osiris Team" and its membership), while orcid_pub has entries for every author in the 2012P&SS...66...64B is another, similar Osiris paper, but both orcid_pub and orcid_user have entries for every entry in the 1981SSRv...30..623V has a single author listed, but has two entries (both '-') for orcid_pub. Also, for 2012P&SS...66...43M, the API doesn't include "orcid_other" in the response when I request it, and for 1981SSRv...30..623V neither "orcid_other" nor "orcid_user" are included when requested. I'm assuming these fields are excluded from the response when every entry in the list is "-". Is that correct? On the other hand, 2012P&SS...66...64B does return orcid_pub even though every entry is "-". Thanks, |
We found several examples of records where the length of the authors list and that of the ORCID arrays (_pub, _user, _other) is different.
In some cases also the size of the orcid arrays is inconsistent, with a _pub array longer than the others.
We are still investigating the issue and we should be able to provide a long list of bibcode to verify, in the coming days.
A first example is 2014ASPC..486..203M
Best regards
Claudio
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: