Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Protected content #80

Open
auniverseaway opened this issue Mar 8, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Protected content #80

auniverseaway opened this issue Mar 8, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels

Comments

@auniverseaway
Copy link
Member

auniverseaway commented Mar 8, 2024

As a privacy oriented business owner, I would like my content to be protected from being visible to the public internet.

Criteria of acceptance

  • Requests to Helix Admin for protected previewing and publishing work as expected (passing IMS Auth Token).
  • Content that lives on content.da.live cannot be accessed without an appropriate header, cert, etc.
  • Live preview works with protected hlx.page content (via MS auth) or we use hlx.live pages as the preview shell.

Additional context

For live preview, I think we could probably pivot to requesting the hlx.live page since we clobber it with the editor contents anyway.

We need to see if helix admin provides any markers (headers, cert, etc.) when it requests content so we can lock down all requests to content.da.live that do not provide one of these auth pieces.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant