Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RDF format profile test records #146

Open
NicoRobertIn opened this issue Oct 6, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

RDF format profile test records #146

NicoRobertIn opened this issue Oct 6, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@NicoRobertIn
Copy link

NicoRobertIn commented Oct 6, 2023

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The output format of the profile tests (the output message when we check if an ontology is, for instance, OWL EL comptaible) is so close to a turtle format RDF graph that a small modification could allow to have a turtle RDF graph that would be stand formatted and reusable by other softwares

Describe the solution you'd like
The error report has this format:

OWL EL not correct: 4 failures

1. Anonymous individuals are not supported

[a owl:NamedIndividual ;
  aPrefix:aSuffix \"a litteral"@en]
    
2. Anonymous individuals are not supported

<https://another.linl/AConcept> a anotherPrefix:AnotherTerm ;
    anotherPrefix:anotherSuffix [ a owl:NamedIndividual ;
        <https://aLast.link/anotherSuffix> ]

It is just missing some dots at the end of statements and a small structuration of the report to have a full formatted turtle RDF graph format. An alignment with an existing ontology like EARL would be highly appreciated

Describe alternatives you've considered
An external parsing is possible but this is obviously relying on the actual structure of the report that can eventually change in future CORESE versions for a reason or another, and giving the responsability to CORESE of structuring its own reports would be great

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant