-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 792
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
5 sec-Annular solar Eclipse 1966-05-20: Sky too dark #3720
Comments
Please attach screenshots for annular and total eclipses |
Strange: diameter moon:sun is 0.999, but eclipse magnitude=1.000, which allows such darkness. It would be interesting to see actual footage of such an almost-total annular. |
Hello @MrRG2024! OK, developers can reproduce the issue. Thanks for the report! |
These two values are not the same because they use different method for calculations. Stellarium's solar radius (695,700 km) is smaller than solar radius in traditional eclipse calculations (696,000 km). We should use the same value, but it may not enough to fix the main issue. |
Good point. What is the source of "our" solar radius @alex-w @xalioth ? Changing that to 696000 (still used in the 2013 Supplement) creates a razor-sharp annular eclipse (again with magnitude 1.000 (looks to be correctly rounded) /obscuration 99.91%. I can also see strange artifacts in ShowMySky on the best spot within a few seconds of annularity when the Lunar shadow races through the zenith, (@10110111 Mode 3 only, no big deal, though.) And I should probably add another brightness tweak to reduce earthshine during annular solar eclipses. |
Mode 3 should be the best in quality. If it suffers from a problem that doesn't exist in lower levels, it's bad. From my side, I can't even reproduce the dark scene as described by the OP. |
This ring is visible over 3 seconds or so. It may be somewhat too dark in 1966, although this is really a border case. Must have looked like circumferential Baileys Beads seconds from totality. (Are there photos of this one? EDIT: YES! http://xjubier.free.fr/en/site_pages/solar_eclipses/ASE_19660520_pg01.html Another interesting study is https://books.googleusercontent.com/books/content?req=AKW5QaevTc-nNaVSLdrU1AJxQzsO2dH61dCU6tEF2hYFIpKpOhxhq9-Mq6z0L2cQnYBKXpfgxTgsVT9Czt_ZghIFFAmSM3X87THB1ZnQ0gs113X-6LbhFzyb9UpdDR6prldG2lw4aa6m-7zx-rkzbBpGRbLCPRQok_sZT7LLldia9bsxiskmhhiq4SwyYFhEEuuT6uB-t39e-c0qgHgXrtCLee70jj40JEOp8T8zSyY-5ZkGae217wMV0WSLDeANABvQLZ7UV2SR0SSXITZC83pytc_xCI9PgQ) For a wider annular eclipse like 2005, sky brightness seems OK. It "is" slightly dark like minutes before a totality. |
We have |
@gzotti @worachate001 please check the master |
@worachate001: |
Yes, and with |
Your 1966-05-20 looks like atmosphere is switched off entirely. If not, it's really a bug. For the others, this looks like the classical Preetham skylight, so the ring-like artifact I mentioned above is another issue. |
Do you have "Dynamic eye adaption" switched off? This might explain the too many stars. I cannot reproduce the amount of darkness either, but this may indeed lie in sub-second time differences. --> The solution for me is "use the more modern sky model, it models solar eclipse brightness much better than the old model". |
Hello,
I find a bug:
-> Astronomical.calculations
-> All Solar Eclipses
-> year 1966
-> table of solar eclipses
-> click 1966-05-20 to go to greatest eclipse point
->> sky is darker then by an total eclipse
best regards
Ralf
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: