Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support temporal assertions regarding a time period including/intersecting a specific time period #697

Open
Seddryck opened this issue Aug 6, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@Seddryck
Copy link
Owner

Seddryck commented Aug 6, 2022

It should be possible to assert that a result-set, with a time period, is including a given time-period. A time period is defined as the closed-open time interval between two datetime.

  • The including assertion should validate if the reference period is fully covered by the time-period defined in the result-set.
  • The intersects assertion should validate if the reference period and the time-period defined in the result-set are overlaping at least a moment.
  • The leads assertions should validate if the reference period is starting after the time-period defined in the result-set.
  • The lags assertions should validate if the reference period is starting after the time-period defined in the result-set.

For lags and leads, it's possible to define a variant strictly="true" to specify that there should be no intersection, meaning that the end-date should be prior to the start-date. As we've closed-open intervals, if the start date and end date are represented by the same value they automatically don't intersect.

<system-under-test>
  <result-set>
    ...
  </result-set>
</system-under-test>
<assert>
  <includes time-period="[2022-06-01;2022-07-01[">
    <time-period start="#3" end="EndPeriodColumn"/>
    <group-by>...<group-by>
  </includes>
</assert>

The optional group-by let you define that system-under-test rows should not be tested as a single set of rows but should be subdivided into subsets, each subset being defined by the group-by.

@Seddryck Seddryck changed the title Support temporal assertions regarding a time period containing a specific time period Support temporal assertions regarding a time period overlaping/intersecting a specific time period Aug 6, 2022
@Seddryck Seddryck changed the title Support temporal assertions regarding a time period overlaping/intersecting a specific time period Support temporal assertions regarding a time period including/intersecting a specific time period Aug 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant