Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support temporal assertion regarding the absence of gap for a time tick #694

Open
Seddryck opened this issue Aug 5, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@Seddryck
Copy link
Owner

Seddryck commented Aug 5, 2022

It should be possible to assert that a result-set, with a column for time ticks, is containing/preceding/succeeding a given datetime. A time tick is defined as the closed-open time interval between a datetime and a timespan.

<system-under-test>
  <result-set>
    ...
  </result-set>
</system-under-test>
<assert>
  <without-gap>
    <time-tick start="#3" span="00:15:00"/>
    <over-period start="2022-06-01" end="2022-07-01"/>
    <group-by>...<group-by>
  </without-gap>
</assert>

The optional over-period lets you define that the test should also report failure if the interval covered by the time-ticks is not containing the start and the end of the period. As we're working with closed-open intervals, it's open-end of the time-tick and the open-end of the period should match.

The optional group-by let you define that system-under-test rows should not be tested as a single set of rows but should be subdivided into subsets, each subset being defined by the group-by.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant