Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

suggestions for mutliterm problems #38

Closed
moeinkh88 opened this issue Jun 8, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

suggestions for mutliterm problems #38

moeinkh88 opened this issue Jun 8, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@moeinkh88
Copy link

Hi,

For multiterm examples, like bagleytorvik, I have found that we need to use arguments as parameters of the problem.
But, isn't it better to have a solver function for a class of problems with muliterm of derivatives and let the user define the problem function manually? Like fractional ODE problems that you made, the user can define the problem and then use the function as an argument (like chua.jl). This way is more user-friendly and more flexible than having a specific problem inside the solver and giving control of the parameters to the user.

@ErikQQY
Copy link
Member

ErikQQY commented Jun 8, 2022

Hi there, I am not sure if I get what you mean, for multi-terms FODE, there is MultiTermsFODEProblem we can use to define our problems:

https://github.com/SciFracX/FractionalDiffEq.jl#a-sophisticated-example

Do we need to do something else?

@moeinkh88
Copy link
Author

OK
So, can we solve the Bagelytorvik equation by using MultiTermsFODEProblem? If so, why is there another separate solver specifically for Bagelytorvik?

@ErikQQY
Copy link
Member

ErikQQY commented Jun 8, 2022

Yeah, MultiTermsFODEProblem can solve BagleyTorvik equations, that solver was initially designed to test the solvers, and I think now that function can be removed.

@ErikQQY ErikQQY closed this as completed Jun 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants