You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For multiterm examples, like bagleytorvik, I have found that we need to use arguments as parameters of the problem.
But, isn't it better to have a solver function for a class of problems with muliterm of derivatives and let the user define the problem function manually? Like fractional ODE problems that you made, the user can define the problem and then use the function as an argument (like chua.jl). This way is more user-friendly and more flexible than having a specific problem inside the solver and giving control of the parameters to the user.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
OK
So, can we solve the Bagelytorvik equation by using MultiTermsFODEProblem? If so, why is there another separate solver specifically for Bagelytorvik?
Yeah, MultiTermsFODEProblem can solve BagleyTorvik equations, that solver was initially designed to test the solvers, and I think now that function can be removed.
Hi,
For multiterm examples, like bagleytorvik, I have found that we need to use arguments as parameters of the problem.
But, isn't it better to have a solver function for a class of problems with muliterm of derivatives and let the user define the problem function manually? Like fractional ODE problems that you made, the user can define the problem and then use the function as an argument (like chua.jl). This way is more user-friendly and more flexible than having a specific problem inside the solver and giving control of the parameters to the user.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: