-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
implement loss of remanence due to warming through Verwey transition in MPMS_analysis.ipynb #2
Comments
Hey @peat22, can you have a look at how this is implemented in the Delphi/Pascal in Quantum Ferret? I am thinking that it makes sense to use the "magnetite curve" determined from the background fit. It seems one could either use the start and end of the magnetite curve (i.e. the first and last blue point blue). Or alternatively could take the excluded temperature range start and end as the before and after remanence values (either approach should give about the same answer if the background is decently fit). |
I'll take a look at this tomorrow. Had a fun day struggling to get anaconda
installed and working (Thanks Plinio!). And I thought Delphi was difficult
to install!
…On Mon, Feb 12, 2024, 12:37 Nick Swanson-Hysell ***@***.***> wrote:
Hey @peat22 <https://github.com/peat22>, can you have a look at how this
is implemented in the Delphi/Pascal in Quantum Ferret? I am thinking that
it makes sense to use the "magnetite curve" determined from the background
fit. It seems one could either use the start and end of the magnetite curve
(i.e. the first and last blue point blue). Or alternatively could take the
excluded temperature range start and end as the before and after remanence
values (either approach should give about the same answer if the background
is decently fit).
Screenshot.2024-02-12.at.10.35.31.AM.png (view on web)
<https://github.com/PmagPy/RockmagPy-notebooks/assets/4332322/b390ee56-4e67-4a06-900f-aa09cabc80f4>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGBXN3UFE3VILULW7LDY3KTYTJOQHAVCNFSM6AAAAABCTLPKPOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSMZZGMYTOMBUGI>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
I have added initial functionality to do this calculation to the function
and the notebook is updated as well to ingest these values and tabulate them 3ae66a1. The next step is to compare to values that are determined within the IRM Quantum Ferret software and to figure out what the relative value is within that software as well. |
This first and last magnetite point approach gives slightly different values. Here are the current values calculated in the notebook:
Here are the values that come out of TVviewer:
The Verwey temperature estimates look to be right on, while the delta FC [Am2/kg] are slightly different. |
Rather than
It makes sense to integrate the magnetite derivative curve which can be implemented with:
|
The resulting values for the example ECMB data are below and are closer to the values out of TVviewer:
|
Jackson and Moskowitz (2020) describe that: The IRMDB software allows interactive analysis and calculation of TV, as well as the loss of remanence due to warming through the transition, using the derivative method of Liu et al. (2004). This loss of remanence calculation should be implemented in MPMS_analysis.ipynb.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: