Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Thoughts on cleaning up adjustments and amendments #380

Open
jar398 opened this issue Dec 30, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Thoughts on cleaning up adjustments and amendments #380

jar398 opened this issue Dec 30, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@jar398
Copy link
Member

jar398 commented Dec 30, 2019

I know they're a mess, sorry. (Was just looking at them.) Here are two ideas for improving them.

  1. Convert all 'version 2' (and even 'version 1') edits to the version 3 edit system (proposition.py), both for uniformity (thus less to learn) and for robustness (they are much less likely to fail, produce wrong answers, generate errors, etc.).

  2. Create an OTT curation taxonomy - I've just expanded that section of my smasher to-do list

Also it might be useful to make a list out of the propositions, and then in addition to doing proclaim on each member of the list, the final test pass can use them as tests (to raise an alarm if one edit gets clobbered by a subsequent edit). That idea was one of the motivations for making propositions be independent objects.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant