-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Source-specific stats? #37
Comments
In any other case, it is impossible to tell that a tree has no effect. A source tree definitely has an effect if there exists a supertree node for which there is a Other cases are grey areas. Note that one could use the subproblem solver on modified versions of the subproblems to test for effects of including a tree without rerunning the entire pipeline. That would require some scripting. If a source tree does not affect any subproblem solution, then it will not effect the whole tree, unless it is the only tree that contests any particular taxon. hope that helps... |
Sounds good. This is what I was thinking as well. Thanks. I wonder if users might want access to such processed information. Alternatively, I could write something (in python, say) and make it available. |
If you write such a script, you can put it in the |
I think it might be useful to generate statistics for the individual source trees. For example, how many nodes in the supertree are due to a particular source (that is, it is the highest ranked source that displays the split)? How many nodes in a source simply support a node created by a higher ranked tree? How many nodes in a source conflict (i.e. were overruled) with the supertree? How many nodes in a source are present in the supertree at all? These types of statistics might give us some sort of "impact score" for individual sources.
Something I've been considering with the Aves supertree: can we identify inconsequential source trees (that it, the supertree would be the same without the source being present)? This is slightly different than the simple counts above, as a tree may be inconsequential because it agrees or conflicts with a higher ranking tree.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: