Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should we integrate neotest? #4133

Closed
ChristianChiarulli opened this issue May 6, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Should we integrate neotest? #4133

ChristianChiarulli opened this issue May 6, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested stale

Comments

@ChristianChiarulli
Copy link
Member

Or maybe write a plugin layer that abstracts aways some of the complicated bits.

@ChristianChiarulli ChristianChiarulli added the question Further information is requested label May 6, 2023
@ChristianChiarulli ChristianChiarulli pinned this issue May 6, 2023
@nieomylnieja
Copy link
Contributor

neotest runners offer debug capabilities, which is often a reimplementation of existing solutions (like nvim-dap-python or nvim-dap-go). Moreover not all runners offer a complete set of these functionalities (neotest-go for one does not support DAP yet). I like neotest, but I feel like they over extended with DAP support and started reinventing the wheel.
Nevertheless It does fill the gap for first class test workflows with visual hints and the summary.
In my own workflow I just don't use it for debugging and use it specifically for testing, and as I said, having discovered it a couple of weeks ago, it has filled a big tests workflow gap for me between Neovim and GoLand for Go development quiet nicely.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is stale because it has been open for 50 days with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Jul 18, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 2, 2023

This issue was closed because it has been inactive for 14 days since being marked as stale.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Aug 2, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested stale
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants