Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-order task icons on browse pages #3490

Open
NancyL opened this issue Feb 16, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Re-order task icons on browse pages #3490

NancyL opened this issue Feb 16, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request UX

Comments

@NancyL
Copy link
Contributor

NancyL commented Feb 16, 2022

Currently, both on the dashboard and the resource template list, there is a set of "action" icons at the right of the page. One Ux aspect with these icons has been found to a bit confusing/off-putting.

The issue is when you are looking at a list of templates for which you have a mix of permissions. The most common permission for a template that people do not have is to edit the template, which is the 3rd icon, reading left to right. But that same person will have permission to copy the template (4th icon). When the "edit" icon is gone, that 4th icon moves over into 3rd place. That is okay in itself, but in the template list, it seems out of place when other templates have all 4 icons. A picture shows it better:

image

Rather than changing the interface too much, I would suggest that the "copy" and "edit" item order be swapped. "Edit" is the least common permission to have, and so should have the last place in the order. Also, it keeps all the other icons aligned.

This, I think, is a pretty minor request, but it does really affect user experience.

@NancyL NancyL added enhancement New feature or request UX labels Feb 16, 2022
@michelleif michelleif added this to Look and feel in LD4P3 Sinopia Backlog May 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request UX
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant