You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I wonder whether deep copy is in fact needed. In our use cases, we slice a matrix many times and pass the sub-matrices to the solver. Deep copying them is suboptimal.
Thanks in advance for your help!
Best,
Max
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We are not always able to work directly with "views", which necessitates us to copy arrays for sgesv / dgesv. The copying does not involve the entire original matrix but only the part indicated by the strides.
Nonetheless, I will take a closer look at this area to see if there's potential for performance improvement.
Hi guys,
I saw functions in NativeLinAlgEx in multi-openblas deep copy the input arrays. Some of the examples are shown below.
I wonder whether deep copy is in fact needed. In our use cases, we slice a matrix many times and pass the sub-matrices to the solver. Deep copying them is suboptimal.
Thanks in advance for your help!
Best,
Max
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: