You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The SystemId type came from an early observation that seemingly all Apstra objects had UUID4 style IDs. Except for the system_id value used to represent switches. Are they different?
They seem to be not different. Objects in Apstra, whether they're global catalog items (where I'd first encountered the UUID4 scheme), graph nodes and relationships and other objects can use seemingly any string with a surprising variety of permitted characters, including some punctuation.
system_id are not special. They should be lumped in with the rest.
This will be a breaking change.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The
SystemId
type came from an early observation that seemingly all Apstra objects had UUID4 style IDs. Except for thesystem_id
value used to represent switches. Are they different?They seem to be not different. Objects in Apstra, whether they're global catalog items (where I'd first encountered the UUID4 scheme), graph nodes and relationships and other objects can use seemingly any string with a surprising variety of permitted characters, including some punctuation.
system_id
are not special. They should be lumped in with the rest.This will be a breaking change.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: