Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Three suggestions for JHV #249

Open
GitatHub opened this issue Aug 17, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Three suggestions for JHV #249

GitatHub opened this issue Aug 17, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@GitatHub
Copy link

My environment is Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS with a 4K display (200% scaled).

Three suggestions for JHV (see the screen snapshot below):

  1. the checkbox before a layer is too narrow;
  2. is it possible to add an option (like the X in the snapshot) to remove the current layer?
  3. the New Layer drop-down box is too narrow and cannot always show the key text of a layer with a long name, for example, a "SECCHI" instrument.

image
image

@bogdanni
Copy link
Contributor

Please run it under Gnome as described at http://swhv.oma.be/user_manual/#linux
That is, in your case, jhelioviewer -J-Dsun.java2d.uiScale=2

The issue is that the JRE cannot determine reliably the pixel scaling under Gnome (the other Linux desktop environments work correctly).

@GitatHub
Copy link
Author

Thank you. Now the GUI is displayed normally.
BTW, is it possible to add the scale option in the Settings of JHV, just like ImageJ as shown in the screenshot.
Thanks.

Please run it under Gnome as described at http://swhv.oma.be/user_manual/#linux That is, in your case, jhelioviewer -J-Dsun.java2d.uiScale=2

123

The issue is that the JRE cannot determine reliably the pixel scaling under Gnome (the other Linux desktop environments work correctly).

@bogdanni
Copy link
Contributor

I would prefer that it works correctly without any setting. It works under the IntelliJ JRE, for example. For a while, that version was distributed with the packages, but it had other bugs which made the program unstable.

I will try again to find a solution (already spent many hours on this).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants