Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Simulating targeted amplicon sequencing #95

Open
standage opened this issue Apr 4, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

Simulating targeted amplicon sequencing #95

standage opened this issue Apr 4, 2019 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement on hold good idea, might happen in the future

Comments

@standage
Copy link
Contributor

standage commented Apr 4, 2019

Greetings! I have a Fasta file containing a few dozen amplicon sequences, and I would like to use InSilicoSeq to simulate targeted sequencing of these amplicons. I had originally used --mode kde --model MiSeq, but this resulted in a read length error. I'm currently trying out other configuration options, but in the mean time do you have any recommendations for simulating amplicon sequencing?

@standage
Copy link
Contributor Author

standage commented Apr 4, 2019

In particular, I don't see any way to adjust the lengths of the reads generated.

@HadrienG
Copy link
Owner

HadrienG commented Apr 9, 2019

Hi!

InSilicoSeq is aimed at simulating reads from whole metagenomes. For amplicons you could try biogrinder.

While less realistic in quality, grinder has some nice amplicons features, such as adding chimeras.

Concerning the read length it'd be easy to add an argument but I'd prefer have an error profile for MiSeq 250. Do you have a good public dataset in mind? I'm happy to build and add the profile to the defaults.

@standage
Copy link
Contributor Author

standage commented Apr 9, 2019

It makes sense that we would want to train an error model using reads of the desired length. I'll let you know if I find a relevant data set.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement on hold good idea, might happen in the future
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants