Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deeplinks to FHIR field definitions use the wrong URL. #44

Open
bvdh opened this issue Jun 20, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Deeplinks to FHIR field definitions use the wrong URL. #44

bvdh opened this issue Jun 20, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@bvdh
Copy link

bvdh commented Jun 20, 2022

On page https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/v2-to-fhir/ConceptMap-datatype-pl-to-location.html

The following url (pattern) is used to refer to field definitions in FHIR:

https://hl7.org/fhir/R4/Location.Location-definitions.html#Location..identifier

This should be:

https://hl7.org/fhir/R4/location-definitions.html#Location.Identifier

This issues is present for all field definition links on this page and may very well also exist on other pages as well.

@hbuitendijk
Copy link
Collaborator

@bvdh : Thank you for catching that. We use in our mapping spreadsheets the notation "[1].identifier" to indicate indicate that the resource yields a different instance (see here for original source: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17b4wqJOzGieNBSdHYZt3ymKucsRDd_h8leaiz_umG7E/edit#gid=0). That mapping is not yet finished, but you can see each room, bed, facility, etc. needs to yield a different Location resource, that are then linked/chained. Normally that column does not have a "." in front, but this syntax actually does so. We'll have to figure out whether to make the parser sensitive to "[n]." to not turn that into an extra dot, but in this case it should be "Location[1].identifier".
@keithboone : What is the easiest path? Change the syntax in the spreadsheet? Or change the parser? I'd rather go with the latter.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants