Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Questions #29

Open
Flamaros opened this issue Sep 5, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Questions #29

Flamaros opened this issue Sep 5, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@Flamaros
Copy link

Flamaros commented Sep 5, 2023

Hello,

Is this render suitable to create a CAD like application as main renderer? I mean for editing 3D geometry, modifying materials,... In real time, my concerns aren't just about the FPS but also about eventual latency due to temporal algorithms used by the renderer or if the API allow to change the content of the rendered scene without loading.

I will also need the ability to draw some primitives without lighting like gizmo,...

@pixnblox
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry we missed your question earlier! Just in case it is still helpful, here we go...

The intent for Aurora is that YES, you should be able to display and edit the primary graphics in real-time. At this time, there may be some latency or artifacts, i.e. the image gets better when it is idle, but is still good during interaction.

However, to your second point, this is about primary graphics, which usually corresponds to the model / scene you are persisting. Any secondary graphics, like gizmos for editing, or text for annotation, should be rendered separately. This is true of any path tracing renderer that uses physical lighting and materials.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants